PayOp: High-Risk Payment Processor Alliance Under Regulatory Scrutiny

tamir
Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:22:01 +0000
Crypto Payment Processor Watch, Ecommerce Technologies, Fintech Decision, PayDo Canada, PayDo EU, PayOp, Transferop Payment Gateway

PayOp is a concerning player in the high-risk payment processing sector, where legitimate regulatory licenses mask systematic facilitation of illegal gambling operations across multiple jurisdictions. Despite holding authorizations from respected regulators, PayOp has been implicated in processing payments for unlicensed casinos.

Crypto Payment Processor Watch Series

Executive Summary

PayOp represent a concerning player in the high-risk payment processing sector, where legitimate regulatory licenses mask systematic facilitation of illegal gambling operations across multiple jurisdictions. Despite holding authorizations from respected regulators, PayOp has been implicated in processing payments for unlicensed casinos, circumventing consumer protection measures, and exploiting regulatory loopholes to enable prohibited gambling activities.

Critical Investment Warning: FinTelegram’s investigations reveal that this high-risk payment processor operates through a complex web of interconnected entities designed to obscure true ownership and enable regulatory arbitrage. The systematic processing of payments for operators like Gamdom, Rolletto, and RichKing Casino demonstrates willful disregard for compliance obligations despite formal regulatory oversight.

Company Overview

The PayOp Alliance Structure

The PayOp partnership, announced in November 2021, creates a comprehensive payment processing ecosystem that spans multiple jurisdictions while targeting high-risk industries.

Read our reports on PayOp.

PayOp Corporate Structure:

Primary Entity: Transferop Payment Gateway Ltd (Canada, FINTRAC registered)

Singapore Operations: FinTech Decision Pte Ltd (MAS regulated)

Headquarters: Vancouver, Canada with operational presence in Ukraine

Founded: 2016

Revenue: $17.6 million annually with 84 employees

Operational Integration and Market Position

Both companies target identical high-risk industries, including gambling, gaming, forex, and cryptocurrency operations across 170+ countries using 500+ payment methods and 100+ currencies. This comprehensive coverage enables them to serve clients that mainstream processors reject while maintaining the veneer of regulatory compliance.

Key Business Metrics

Metric | Value
PayOp Trading Name | PayOp
Website | https://payop.com
PayOp Legal Entity | Transferop Payment Gateway Ltd / FinTech Decision Pte Ltd
PayOp Registration (Canada) | FINTRAC Registered MSB
PayOp Registration (Singapore) | MAS Regulated (Singapore)
PayOp Founded | 2016
PayOp Headquarters | Vancouver, Canada / Singapore / Ukraine
Countries Coverage | 170+ countries
Payment Methods Supported | 500+ payment methods
Currencies Supported | 100+ currencies
Target Industries | High-risk: Gambling, Gaming, Forex, Crypto
Partnership (2021) | Strategic Partnership (Nov 2021)
Key Personnel (PayOp) | Anastasia Semenkova (CEO), Denys Myloserdov
FCA License Number | 900916
Compliance Rating | ORANGE (PayRate42 downgrade)

The impressive operational scale masks fundamental compliance failures that expose both companies to significant regulatory enforcement actions across multiple jurisdictions.

Regulatory Framework and Compliance Failures

Current Regulatory Status

Despite maintaining authorizations from multiple respected regulators, PayOp has systematically violated their compliance obligations:

PayOp Licenses:

Canada: FINTRAC Money Services Business registration

Singapore: MAS regulation through FinTech Decision Pte Ltd

UK: Operations through Ecommerce Technologies Ltd partnership

Systematic Compliance Violations

Issue | Description | Impact
Illegal Gambling Facilitation | Processing payments for unlicensed online casinos across EU | Critical
Gamdom Casino Integration | Deep partnership with Curacao-licensed Gamdom for EU players | Critical
Rolletto Unauthorized Transactions | Unauthorized transactions to unlicensed Santeda International casino | High
False Merchant Category Codes | Using misleading MCCs to disguise gambling transactions | High
GamStop Circumvention | Helping gambling addicts bypass UK self-exclusion schemes | Critical
UK Gambling Act Violations | Criminal offense under Section 33 – unlicensed gambling services | Critical
Terms of Service Violations | Failure to enforce prohibited gambling activities clauses | Medium
AML/KYC Compliance Gaps | Inadequate Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering controls | High
Chargeback Processing Issues | Complex transaction structures complicate consumer protection | Medium
RichKing Casino Facilitation | Payment facilitation for illegal gambling site with CoinsPaid | High
Customer Fund Holding Issues | Issues with holdback deposits and payment provider problems | Medium
Regulatory Loophole Exploitation | Using regulatory arbitrage between jurisdictions | High

The most damaging violations involve systematic processing of payments for unlicensed gambling operators targeting jurisdictions where such activities are explicitly prohibited.

The Gamdom Connection: A Case Study in Regulatory Evasion

Offshore Casino Integration

The partnership’s most significant compliance failure involves deep integration with Gamdom, a Curacao-licensed crypto casino operated by Smein Hosting. Despite lacking authorization within the European Economic Area, Gamdom actively targets EU players through PayOp payment processing services.

Read our Gamdom reports here.

Transaction Structure:

1. EU players purchase “Gamdom Coins” through PayOp

2. Payments are processed through Vilnius IT Solutions UAB in Lithuania

3. Funds flow to Gamdom’s Curacao operations via Clear Junction LTD

4. Complex structure designed to evade regulatory detection and chargeback protection

Regulatory Violations:

Facilitating unlicensed gambling in restricted jurisdictions

Circumventing EU gambling regulations through transaction laundering

Processing payments for activities prohibited under local laws

Enabling vulnerable gamblers to bypass consumer protection measures

Multiple Gambling Violations: A Pattern of Misconduct

The Rolletto Scandal

In May 2024, unauthorized transactions were discovered flowing from UK bank accounts (Monzo, HSBC, Barclays) through PayOp to Rolletto, an unlicensed casino operated by Santeda International. The transactions violated multiple regulatory frameworks:

UK Gambling Act Section 33: Criminal offense for unlicensed gambling services

False MCCs: Misleading merchant category codes to disguise gambling transactions

GamStop Circumvention: Targeting self-excluded gambling addicts

Banking Fraud: Misrepresenting transaction nature to bypass banking blocks

RichKing Casino Warnings

FinTelegram issued urgent warnings about RichKing Casino operations facilitated by PayOp and CoinsPaid. The warnings highlighted systematic processing of payments for operators lacking proper licensing and consumer protections.

Corporate Structure and Beneficial Ownership

Complex Ownership Networks

Entity | Jurisdiction | Role | Status
Transferop Payment Gateway Ltd | Canada (FINTRAC) | PayOp Operating Entity | Active MSB
FinTech Decision Pte Ltd | Singapore (MAS) | PayOp Singapore Entity | MAS Regulated
Gamdom (Smein Hosting) | Curacao | Offshore Crypto Casino Client | Compliance Violations
Rolletto (Santeda International) | Gibraltar/Curacao | Unlicensed Casino Client | Unlicensed UK Operations
RichKing Casino | Unlicensed | Illegal Gambling Site | FinTelegram Warning Issued
Clear Junction LTD | UK (FCA E-Money) | Banking Partner for Transactions | FCA Regulated E-Money
Vilnius IT Solutions UAB | Lithuania | Gamdom Payment Processing | EU Payment Channel

The PayOp alliance operates through a complex network of entities across multiple jurisdictions, creating regulatory arbitrage opportunities and obscuring true beneficial ownership:

Ukrainian Operational Control:

Most operational staff located in Ukraine (Kyiv)

Key personnel: Oleg Pikarevskyi, Matvii Mikhnevych, Ivan Pronchenkov

Technical development and customer support centralized in Ukraine

Regulatory Shell Structure:

Canadian and UK entities provide regulatory legitimacy

Singapore operations target Asian high-risk markets

Malta entity enables post-Brexit EU operations

Complex structure designed to exploit regulatory gaps

Customer Complaints and Trustpilot Evidence

Systematic Customer Abuse

Trustpilot reviews reveal a pattern of systematic abuse of customers seeking refunds for illegal gambling transactions. In total, PayOp received 32% 1-star ratings:

Customer Testimonials:

“PayOp appears to be knowingly facilitating payments to unlicensed and illegal online gambling operators”

“They allow illegal gambling companies such as Rolletto to process payments using PayOp”

“By processing these transactions, PayOp actively supports and profits from illegal gambling operations”

“Avoid PayOp at all costs if you value integrity and consumer protection”

Operational Issues:

Inability to pay back holdback deposits

Payment provider problems affecting customer funds

Repetitive verification processes designed to delay refunds

Systematic refusal to reverse illegal gambling transactions

Risk Assessment and Investment Implications

Regulatory Enforcement Risk

PayOp faces imminent regulatory enforcement across multiple jurisdictions:

UK Enforcement Risk:

FCA investigation of Ecommerce Technologies Ltd license 900916

Potential criminal charges under UK Gambling Act Section 33

Financial Ombudsman Service complaints escalation

Canadian Enforcement Risk:

FINTRAC review of MSB registrations for both entities

AML/KYC compliance failures across multiple jurisdictions

Potential criminal money laundering charges

Operational Sustainability

The business model depends entirely on relationships that violate regulatory frameworks:

80%+ of business derived from high-risk gambling operations

Systematic violation of terms of service across both platforms

Complex transaction structures designed to evade detection

Multiple security and operational issues affecting customer funds

Reputational Contamination

Association with PayOp creates cascading risks:

Banking partners face AML compliance contamination

Legitimate merchants risk regulatory scrutiny

Professional service providers face liability exposure

Regulatory authorities question oversight effectiveness

Whistleblower Testimonies and Inside Information

Customer Protection Failures

Multiple whistleblowers and customers have provided evidence of systematic failures:

Gambling Addiction Exploitation:

Active targeting of GamStop-registered individuals

Refusal to process refunds for vulnerable gamblers

Complex transaction structures preventing consumer protection

Systematic circumvention of banking blocks on gambling

Operational Deficiencies:

Inability to maintain adequate reserves for customer funds

Payment provider relationship problems affecting operations

Repetitive compliance processes designed to frustrate customers

Systematic avoidance of regulatory reporting obligations

Industry Impact and Regulatory Response

PayRate42 Downgrade

PayOp has been downgraded to ORANGE compliance status by PayRate42, the leading payment processor rating authority, specifically due to their involvement with unlicensed gambling operations.

Downgrade Factors:

Systematic processing of payments for unlicensed gambling

Failure to enforce terms of service prohibitions

Complex transaction structures designed to evade detection

Multiple customer complaints regarding illegal gambling facilitation

Regulatory Environment Evolution

The PayOp case demonstrates critical gaps in cross-border payment regulation:

Multiple regulators supervising the same operational network

Lack of coordination between FCA, FINTRAC, and MAS oversight

Complex corporate structures exploiting regulatory arbitrage

Need for enhanced beneficial ownership transparency requirements

Investment Recommendation

Risk Rating: CRITICAL – AVOID

PayOp presents unacceptable investment risks that disqualify both entities from legitimate business consideration:

Primary Disqualifying Factors:

1. Systematic Regulatory Violations: Willful processing of payments for unlicensed gambling

2. Criminal Enterprise Facilitation: Active support for operators violating criminal law

3. Consumer Protection Failures: Exploitation of vulnerable gambling addicts

4. Complex Evasion Structures: Corporate architecture designed to avoid accountability

5. Multiple Jurisdiction Exposure: Enforcement risk across UK, Canada, EU, and Singapore

6. Operational Instability: Customer fund holding issues and payment provider problems

Required Actions for Investment Consideration

Both entities would require comprehensive remediation before investment consideration:

Immediate Requirements:

Cessation of all gambling-related payment processing

Comprehensive audit of all merchant relationships

Implementation of robust transaction monitoring systems

Proactive cooperation with all regulatory authorities

Transparent beneficial ownership disclosure across all entities

Long-term Requirements:

Independent compliance monitoring for minimum 24 months

Regulatory approval for all new high-risk merchant relationships

Quarterly reporting to all supervisory authorities

Customer fund segregation and protection mechanisms

Professional liability insurance for compliance failures

Whistleblower Call to Action

The PayOp investigation demonstrates the critical importance of insider information in exposing payment processor misconduct. Current and former employees, merchants, and customers with knowledge of violations are encouraged to provide confidential information.

Specific Information Sought:

Internal communications regarding gambling compliance policies

Merchant onboarding procedures for high-risk clients

Financial records showing transaction flows to unlicensed operators

Evidence of regulatory reporting failures or omissions

Documentation of customer complaint handling procedures

Secure Reporting: Information can be safely submitted through FinTelegram’s secure whistleblower platform:

Share Information via Whistle42

Conclusion

The PayOp alliance represents a sophisticated regulatory evasion scheme that exploits legitimate licensing frameworks to facilitate illegal gambling operations across multiple jurisdictions. While both entities maintain authorizations from respected regulators, their systematic violations demonstrate that regulatory licensing alone cannot ensure compliance integrity.

Key Findings:

Strategic partnership designed to exploit regulatory arbitrage

Systematic processing of payments for unlicensed gambling operations

Complex corporate structures obscuring beneficial ownership and accountability

Multiple customer protection failures affecting vulnerable gambling addicts

Operational instability threatening customer fund security

Investment Verdict: PayOp is unsuitable for investment or business partnership until comprehensive remediation addresses systematic compliance failures and regulatory violations.

The case highlights critical weaknesses in cross-border payment regulation and demonstrates the need for enhanced coordination between supervisory authorities to prevent legitimate licensing from being exploited for illegal activities.

This analysis is based on regulatory filings, customer complaints, investigative reports, and publicly available information. The serious nature of the compliance violations requires independent legal and regulatory review before engaging with either entity.